🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing number of states are considering similar bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' innocence". A law may be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged lawmakers to approve a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic statement supporting a ban for minors without guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a good first step," commented one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on strong data".

Last year, interest grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. A prominent charity set up by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content suggests that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are secure and fit for children," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is largely happening at the local government level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills mandating parental consent for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to copy this path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international bodies strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The agency points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

While this worldwide conversation unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and its followers indicate that governments around the world are no longer prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.